Madre's Missives


Inadvertent and Occasionally Intentional Thoughts

May 06th, 2007

Someone to add to my "To Read" List

Posted At: 1:36am by Sandra Ostapowich

Scholar: Ordaining Women Is Disrespectful
Says Promotion of Female Priests Overemphasizes Masculinity

ROME, MAY 4, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Those who want to ordain women to the priesthood manifest a failure to recognize the dignity of women, said an expert in moral theology and women's issues.

Pia de Solenni asserted this during her April 27 conference at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome.

De Solenni won the Pontifical Prize of the Academies in 2001, receiving an award from John Paul II for her doctoral thesis on St. Thomas Aquinas. She is the director of Life and Women's Issues at the Family Research Council in Washinton, D.C.

At the conference, de Solenni used St. Thomas' arguments to analyze the issue of the ordination of women to the priesthood in light of the natural complementarity between the sexes.

St. Thomas taught that woman was not created from man's head in order to rule over him, nor from his foot to be ruled by him, but from his side in order to rule with him, she explained.

Ordinatio Sacerdotalis
The 1994 Vatican document "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis" concentrates on three basic points, de Solenni explained: "Christ, in ordaining only men, acted freely without constraints by cultural norms; nonadmission to the priesthood is not a sign of lesser dignity; the Church does not have the faculty to ordain women."

De Solenni illustrated the first point saying that many claim Christ ordained only men because of the cultural norms of his day. Since the role of women has changed, some say the Church should also adapt and allow women to be ordained to the priesthood, she said.

De Solenni contended, however, that the Gospels show how Christ often broke with the cultural norms of his day: In fact, it was to the Samaritan woman at the well that he revealed himself clearly as the Messiah -- to her as to no other, she said.

Equal dignity
"Ordinatio Sacerdotalis" points out that the non-admission of women to the priesthood does not signify a lesser dignity. The entire history of the Church, said de Solenni, "witnesses to the presence and active participation of women."

"It was the consent, understanding and devotion of a woman that brought the Church to us," and the fact that the Virgin Mary was not chosen by her son to be a priest "indicates that the sacrament does not discriminate on the basis of dignity or merit," de Solenni explained.

De Solenni reiterated a point from "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis" which says the question of women's vocations should not be confined to ordination.

"Woman will never be the bridegroom, in any form. The temptation to force upon women a masculine paradigm arises from our confused notions of power and authority which, in turn, devalue her vocation as a bride, clearly illustrated by Mary," de Solenni said.

Ordaining a woman, she said, "would be, in essence, to show complete disregard for the reality she is as a woman, as a bride."

Masculine vs. feminine
De Solenni asserted: "The promotion of ordaining women to the priesthood is a sign of misunderstanding and even disrespect for the dignity of woman."

The fact that "the significance of the feminine identity is so largely misunderstood or even disregarded, indicates that our very notion of Church is in peril, has lost personality. She has become an 'it,' a mere institution, rather than a living being," de Solenni added.

The discussion of ordaining women to the priesthood has been a sort of "overemphasis of the masculine," she said.

"No doubt," continued de Solenni, "women need a voice in the Church, but it must be an authentic voice and not their voice made to sound like a man's."

Women, she stated, have a unique role in the Church and in society and that role should not be forced into masculine paradigms. "To do so," she said, "runs the risk of losing what is truly feminine -- not the femininity of fashion, but the varied femininity of women saints, whose personalities and strengths span just as far as those of men saints ... if not more."



Edited on: May 06th, 2007 1:59 am
[ Printer Friendly Version ]


Comments

Re: Someone to add to my "To Read" List

"[De Solenni] is the director of Life and Women's Issues at the Family Research Council in Washinton, D.C."

Ummmm, would that be the same Family Research Council that is so paranoid of homosexuality that they even think that the cartoon character Spongebob Squarepants is gay? Anyone holding that high of a position with that FRC is *sure* to be a rational source of knowledge...

Re: Someone to add to my "To Read" List

I don't know about that. But I have wondered about Spongebob and Patrick...

Re: Someone to add to my "To Read" List

Uh-huh. How very perceptive.

Happy reading, then. You'll find a whole lot of agreeable reading material from the FRC. And Jerry Falwell, too...

Have you heard about the purple Teletubby? I think he might be One Of Those, too. Oh, and Bert and Ernie. Any other witches... Oops--I mean, gay children's characters ...out there?

Re: Someone to add to my "To Read" List

"Anyone holding that high of a position with that FRC is *sure* to be a rational source of knowledge... "

For those who are keeping score, this is a classic example of an ad hominum ex concessis (guilt by association).

The veracity of an argument is not dependant upon the company kept by the one making the argument. In other words, E would still equal MC2 even if Einstein were a member of the FRC.

Re: Someone to add to my "To Read" List

wcwirla writes:
"For those who are keeping score, this is a classic example of an ad hominum ex concessis (guilt by association)."

Ooooohhhh, Latin! I love it! You must be very, very serious...

(Putting on my very serious scowl and using my very serious voice now...)

wcwirla continues:
"The veracity of an argument is not dependant upon the company kept by the one making the argument. In other words, E would still equal MC2 even if Einstein were a member of the FRC."

Well, wcwirla, wouldn't inferring a correlation between a scientific truth (E=MC2) and a theological opinion (ordaining women is disrespectful) also be an example of an hominum ex concessis? By using a scientifically-proven truth as a parallel to the original posting in your rebuttal, you are inferring that the original posting is as full of truth as E=MC2.

The original posting was an opinion -- it cannot ever be scientifically proven to be true. And, as should be done of all opinions, I didn't take it at face value. I judged the opinion's veracity first on the mouthpiece of the opinion -- in this case, someone of high importance at an organization known for illogical and unreasonable statements in the past. Understanding the context of an opined statement -- that's part of what's known as critical analysis.

There is also another commonly-held "truth" to which I was originally adhering: "You are judged by the company you keep." And, in this case, anyone who holds a position of such importance in an organization as fallacious and misguiding as the FRC should be first and foremost judged by the company s/he keeps.

Comment on entry entitled "Someone to add to my "To Read" List"

You may use BBCode within your posts, a reference is available here.
Name: 
E-mail Address: 
Web Site: 
Subject: 

Notify me of replies to this comment.
Auth Code
Please type the letters in the image above:

E-mail Article
Send to:
From: