The Fine Line We Walk

Posted On: March 24th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

As Lutherans, we walk a fine line, theologically speaking.  We are very careful to maintain doctrinal paradoxes while not falling into errors of one side or the other.  It’s kind of fun, in discussions, that we can just as easily take either side of an argument in an attempt to bring that paradoxical tension about and get back on that fine line.

Sometimes we fail.


I grew up with a lot of traditions that would make many of the people I know today cringe.  For example, it was perfectly normal for women to vest in an alb and read lessons or serve as communion assistants.  I did so myself many times.  Later in life, I had an opportunity to re-examine these practices and came out the other side with a different conclusion than the one I originally held.  This wasn’t a casual decision or something easily changed.  I had planned and build my education and future career on this foundation.  A different conclusion meant that a lot of what I had done and invested time and energy (and my parents’ money!) to do was for naught.  But it was, in my opinion, the right thing to do and I couldn’t NOT do it in light of the self-examination and maintain any semblance of integrity within myself.

It certainly wasn’t pleasant to be confronted with the opportunity for self-examination.  It usually isn’t.  But that doesn’t mean it needs to be done occasionally.  That was the point of my previous post, regardless of the casual and unnecessarily caustic tone I mistakenly took with it.

Let’s face it, we have all seen faithful Lutherans abandon our faith for greener pastures.  Many of them have admitted that at least part of the reason that they were attracted to it was because of the high regard for ceremony and practice in the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches.  Higher Things has even been suffered such a loss of one of our founders.  Some, through careful counsel and self-examination, have stepped back from the very edge of the precipice.  From what I have observed, these “prodigal sons” have not disregarded ceremonies and traditions, but they make a concerted effort to show how these practices point us to Christ.  That’s what they’re for after all, aren’t they?

On many Lutheran controversies, I have been something of an outsider and have had to figure things out on my own much of the time.  I didn’t know about the Book of Concord until I was in graduate school.  I had to figure out the whole Seminex thing on my own by spending hours in the library reading up on it.  These are not things I was taught (surprisingly enough) in my formal Lutheran education.  I was not raised with our traditions but grew up in a pretty progressive LCMS church where they were pretty much mocked and/or bucked.  I haven’t studied at a Concordia.  I attended an ELCA seminary.  And after all that, I became confessional and have managed to just pick up on all this stuff that many Lutherans take for granted.

When I was a student at an ELCA seminary, it was during and just after the turmoil in that denomination over the JDDJ and the agreement formed between the ELCA and EC-USA.  I didn’t understand all the flap going on, so I did some research.  Ever tried to figure out what Episcopalians actually believe?  It’s something like nailing Jell-o to a tree.  What I was able to conclude, however, was that doctrine is a pretty flexible thing for them.  The amount of flexibility made it almost seem irrelevant.  What is truly important is the liturgy.  The liturgy, done properly and rigidly according to tradition, is what matters and in everything else there is tons of wiggle room.

I know that the traditions of our liturgy do not rise to that level of authority or uniformity for Lutherans.  Some may sigh wistfully at the luxury of being able to openly and freely practice the historic traditions of the church without being worried about what Grandma Schmidt is going to stir up among the blue-haired crowed because that’s not how they way they were when she grew up, or having some Boomer wonder why he and his buddies can’t jam to some CCM during the service.  That would be nice, indeed.

My problem with the traditions comes largely from the information I gleaned studying the Episcopalian church.  That left a huge impression on me.  I have frequently encountered pastors, vicars, seminarians, students, and laymen who would wax poetic on liturgical traditions such as bowing and genuflecting and the use of incense - even bells - in the service.  But when it came to talking about things like our Lutheran doctrine, they could not tell me the basic catechism explanation on how to distinguish Law and Gospel, much less apply it.  I have also talked to laity who were confused and hurt by their pastor’s attitude about instituting new traditions.  It’s not that they were necessarily opposed to any changes, but they didn’t understand and their pastor was too personally concerned about liturgical correctness to worry about things like catechesis or pastoral care in the matter. 

So when I hear more talk this weekend about breaking out the fancy rose vestments, red flags go up in my mind.  Is the bling overpowering everything else?  Are we more consumed with the color of the day than the Gospel?  Probably not.  I certainly hope not.  But maybe it is.  It’s certainly something for us all to consider and reflect upon, especially during Lent, whether we’re a pastor in a rose chasuble or a layman in our Sunday clothes sitting in the pew.  Is there any chance that our love for tradition and enjoyment of practicing it can teach others that our way is the “right” way to do it or that to be truly Lutheran, we should try to emulate the way a certain church does things?  This is a question we need to continually ask of ourselves as leadership in Higher Things, but it is also one that is more widely applicable to all Lutherans.

Yesterday’s post was from this perspective.  I have read in countless places that I singled out Pr. Petersen and Redeemer, Fort Wayne.  I have not.  I think it’s wonderful that they have the traditions they do and do not fault them for it.  It is my personal opinion that it might be a little bit ornate for me, but that’s just an opinion and anyone is welcome to have a different one without us having to hate each other.   I am deeply disappointed that my post was the impetus for the strife and hurt it has caused.  That was not my intention at all and I am sorry.

Edited on: March 24th, 2009 6:33 pm


Comments:


Re: The Fine Line We Walk

Posted On: March 24th, 2009 at 6:40 pm by Sandra Ostapowich
If anyone would like to comment on this post or this issue in general, you may email me at ostapowich@higherthings.org.

Or, for the sake of openness, I have posted these blogs at the Wittenberg Trail where such adult discussions are more appropriately handled, given the irate tone of some comments.


Re: The Fine Line We Walk

Posted On: March 26th, 2009 at 2:59 pm by Rev. Charles Lehmann
Dear Sandra, Pr. Borghardt, and Pr. Cwirla,

It is not my place to question motives or to assign them when my sinful flesh decides that it doesn't like what it's reading.

Sandra,

I take you at your word. You did not mean to offend me or to attack my friend. I accept your apology and forgive you.

That there are reasons that seemed legitimate to me for taking what you wrote the way I did, but that doesn't matter. I disobeyed the 8th commandment. I should have accepted your word in the first place.

Please forgive me.

George,

I also disbelieved what you yourself said, ignored your apology, and said hurtful things that I wish I never had.

Please forgive me.

Bill,

I attacked Higher Things because of a conflict I had with two of its staff/board. I did this despite the fact that I have seen for myself the wonderful things that they do for the youth of the church.

Please forgive me.

To all,

I need to learn to defend my friends without yielding to sinful anger.

Please forgive me.

I've said more than enough, and this is all I'm going to say.

Re: The Fine Line We Walk

Posted On: March 26th, 2009 at 9:29 pm by Sandra Ostapowich
Of course, I forgive you.


BlogSCL 2.3.0 © 2004-2005 StanLemon.net